data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb859/cb8597d675928836df04dc576d734e6668568ff6" alt="Topaz detail in lightroom"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17205/1720521998706801ab444b6c881e9906ee50e15b" alt="topaz detail in lightroom topaz detail in lightroom"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ae/e59aea8d2bd4a2b3102a92f0909e931b3df0f574" alt="topaz detail in lightroom topaz detail in lightroom"
You must have misunderstood what they said. THIS is what I want to work with-everything else GOES!". Everything else that the raw file contains are irrelevant, so I can throw them out. When you convert a raw file to tif, you are in effect, saying, "this is my base photo, it contains all the colors, all the other possible variations of white balance, contrast, levels, etc. A Tiff file is NOT a raw file, it is just ONE of the possible ways for a photo to look while a raw file represents the entire spectrum of possible ways to edit and present a photo. It's compression, or lack of it has nothing to do with file structure. In addition, in Noiseware 5 you can control noise reduction through highlights, mid-tones and shadows and through different colors, not to mention the standard frequency options. I've tested them all thoroughly and Noiseware 5 is far superior in that regard. The noise will either be more or less apparent. I understand about marketing but I'm not sure if they could blatantly say these things on a YouTube video that all the world can see at any time if there wasn't some truth to it.ĭo others also believe that I will limit my adjustment ability if I follow their advice? They said that the thing that makes DeNoise unique is that it maintains the detail while getting rid of the noise instead of smoothing it out like other products. The said that if you do adjustments before you DeNoise you are adjusting the noise as well which makes it harder for DeNoise to get rid of it. I watched additional video by them and they later stated that the TIFF file was also an uncompressed file so you could work with it the same as RAW.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7b25/c7b2522e799801c3fd1054a53c430820c0afdac6" alt="topaz detail in lightroom topaz detail in lightroom"
Before I left Lr for another workflow tool, I was pretty happy with my noise and sharpening results in Lr. THEN use additional anti-noise tools if you feel you need to.įrankly, I think the Lr anti-noise and sharpening is just fine, all it takes is practice to use effectively. I would not do it that way, use Lr or your favorite development tool, and then use the anti-noise and sharpening it provides. ANY bit mapped file is inherently less malleable than a raw file.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb859/cb8597d675928836df04dc576d734e6668568ff6" alt="Topaz detail in lightroom"